No worries of a barrier

 Ministry of Commerce spokesman, said Feb. 16 that China and some countries in the economic stimulus packages, priority to purchase their products made in terms of deep concern.
This that can be considered the latest U.S. rescue package passed by Congress programs include the ; provision known as ism officially confirmed a few years it also has large, there have been many people be so hurry? really worried, big time a few years, what can be made? Of course, few places in the hair coupons, as if anxious Ministry of Commerce said possible, but look at the practice, precisely, but poor response to say, a lot of places come up with a As for anger, not to. That is to say, as an economy, we are opposed to international barriers, internal barriers do not complain. those who come up with a U.S. Priority is deeply dissatisfied with the Buy American.
do not know what the world has the economic experience of advocating free trade situation occurs. I see the local businesses back garden that is is naive and innocent expression. mature and realistic is to believe that others will engage in the performance of local protection, they would engage in local protection, while not engaged in that local protection, and say development would be, quite a number of mature and realistic level of the people, not each other to prove their childish and naive, and have quietly enjoy each other, those who engage in protected areas is mature and realistic eyes of the fool, is will not even protect themselves in the Benbo is even the unspoken rules is that we understand this is not too childish and naive features, because barriers to the international market is not a The existence of sovereignty, because sovereignty is always the first to exercise sovereign jurisdiction. on the economy, the emphasis is not on the exercise of sovereignty of the project management of large and small, the quasi-outs, the rejected, but rather to establish a unified market system, But the reality seems quite the opposite. We can do what the city subway in which city the road to wide, is a strong requirement, but the same rules on the domestic market is weak requirements.
when we fight against international trade protectionism, the If someone said that China should first remove trade protectionism, how we will face. I do not think a country if the internal problems due to loss of the principle of upholding international qualifications, as we can not because they are black kiln elsewhere in the world can be against the enslavement of labor, but doing so on the premise that we own and never let go of the black kilns. reason fairly, if we lack of sensitivity of local protectionism, but particularly concerned about protectionism in international trade , is not some unreasonable it?
I have read in the read, criticized the U.S. government's policy is not new in the international community in the United States is not described as new. I think these attacks are real or favor. childish, naive, or mature, reality, and it probably will not be a problem , expressed the views or attitude, is the true attitude. plan was debated by Congress after the voting results, the debate caused by the planned changes, but can not form a consensus to the domestic concerns of local protectionism is not deep, only the deep concern of international trade protectionism, which is strange. Furthermore, I want to say a clear distinction between what characteristics.
2009/2/17